СШАSenior Software Engineer, AI Training - US
2 нед. назад
СШАSeniorRemote
Evaluate AI coding agents' responses for engineering quality without writing production code.
Обязанности
- • Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end
- • Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think
- • Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code
- • Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)
- • Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading
- • Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code
Требования
- • Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
- • Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python
- • Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor
- • Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
- • Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line
- • Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement
- • Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
- • High bar for what good engineering looks like
Будет плюсом
- • Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
- • Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards
Другое
- Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week
- Check out this Loom video for more details:
- We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
- This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.
- You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:
- • Whether the response makes sense
- • Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
- • Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
- • Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer
- This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.
- We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:
- • Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
- • Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
- • Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
- • Would this interaction build or erode trust?
- You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.
- • Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location
- • Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible
- • Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well
- • Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat
- • Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview