Security Compliance Program Manager (Contract)

2 нед. назад

USAHybrid

compliancefederal contractsproject management

Manage and build the compliance function for federal contracts in a government technology company.

Обязанности

Authorization status gates what Kaizen can bid and deliver. We have active federal contracts across civilian and defense agencies, and every pursuit in our pipeline turns on it.
We are standing up a dedicated compliance function and hiring for it permanently. This engagement builds the operating machinery in the meantime: the register, the calendar, the submissions, and the evidence trail. Hands-on production work rather than advisory.

Другое

Government technology has failed the public for decades, and Americans have been conditioned to expect websites from the 90s for essential public services.
Kaizen exists to strengthen trust in American public services by building technology that residents and public servants are proud to use. We partner with local, state, and federal agencies to replace legacy systems with modern, AI-native software that is worthy of the people they serve. We started in outdoor recreation, and now we're building toward something much larger — the software layer that powers how Americans access any government service.
Our platform reaches 55 million Americans across 50+ agencies. Our goal: build technology that touches the lives of 100 million residents by the end of the year.
Founded in 2022 and based in New York City, Kaizen has raised $35 million from NEA, a16z, Accel, 776, and Carpenter Capital. We're builders, designers, and operators who believe that beautifully designed software shouldn't be a luxury in government. It's how you earn trust back.
FedRAMP. We are pursuing certification under the current Certification Class framework in a government cloud region, built on the 20x pathway rather than a legacy Rev 5 program. We are designing for reuse rather than authorizing each product from scratch, so the change-control side of an authorization matters here as much as the initial package. You would own the operations side: control implementation status, the inherited-versus-owned split, POA&M currency, continuous monitoring, Key Security Indicators, the machine-readable package, marketplace status, and the evidence flow to our independent assessor.
DoD Impact Levels. Our work spans multiple impact levels and they do not all sit in the same place. Some run in environments we operate, others inside a customer's or a partner's. You would own knowing the reciprocity map, reading a hosting platform's actual authorization coverage against the agency in front of us, and getting the control-responsibility matrix from whoever holds the boundary.
CMMC. A separate track from the product, and keeping the two separate matters: 800-53 governs what we deliver to the government, 800-171 governs how Kaizen itself handles controlled information. You would run the self-assessment against NIST 800-171 Rev 2, build a corporate CUI system security plan distinct from any product SSP, compute and maintain the SPRS score, keep the annual senior-official affirmation on schedule, and own the POA&M entries. The scoping decision is the single biggest cost lever in the program. Familiarity with the DFARS safeguarding and incident-reporting clauses matters here.
What we expect to have in hand at each stage.
An obligation register covering every federal contractual and regulatory requirement Kaizen carries, with its source, cadence, and owner. This means reading the contracts and subcontracts for FAR and DFARS flowdowns, not just the security frameworks. Expect employee notices, required training, prohibited technology, EEO and labor reporting, and OCI alongside the control work
A monthly POA&M process stood up, with the first cycle assembled and submitted to our platform partner on schedule. Version one can be a spreadsheet with ten honest rows
An obligation calendar covering every recurring deadline, each with a named owner and an escalation path
NIST 800-171 self-assessment completed and scored, with the SPRS package staged for a company official to affirm and every gap carrying a dated POA&M entry
Control-to-evidence mapping, version one, with inherited controls separated from shared and from application-specific
Certification application materials assembled, including a machine-readable package that validates
A corporate CUI system security plan scoped to a named group of users, separate from the product SSP
Federal paperwork current: DD Form 2345 and JCP registration, DD 254, PIEE and SPRS administration, SAM.gov
Identity verification vendor evaluated and selected against FedRAMP-aligned screening requirements
Four plans written and usable: configuration management, incident response, contingency, supply chain risk management
Continuous monitoring and log retention documented and running
Agency security questionnaires answered without executive involvement
FCL readiness package staged
Direct experience submitting in federal portals, SPRS and PIEE specifically. "Supported" and "submitted" are different things
Has run a NIST 800-171 self-assessment or RMF package end to end, with personal accountability for the outcome
Has computed a SPRS score and can explain the mechanics without looking them up: the 110-control basis, the weighting, and what a POA&M entry does to it
Hands-on with NIST 800-53 Rev 5 inside a real SSP, not just reading one. Knows what a control implementation statement has to say to survive an assessor
Current on FedRAMP as it exists in 2026, and fluent in 20x specifically. Certification Classes, Key Security Indicators, machine-readable packages, continuous validation. We are building on 20x, so experience that stops at Rev 5 documentation will be working against the grain
Knows where Rev 5 still binds. High remains a Rev 5 process and new Rev 5 certifications stop in June 2027
Can reason about a shared authorization boundary: inherited versus shared versus application-specific controls, and what kind of change triggers a significant-change request
Working knowledge of the DoD Cloud Computing SRG and how Impact Levels sit on FedRAMP baselines. The CSP and Mission Owner split matters here, and so does reading a hosting platform's ATO coverage against the agency doing the buying
Has worked opposite a 3PAO or independent assessor on evidence requests and knows what they accept in practice
Can read a contract for FAR and DFARS flowdowns and turn them into a tracked obligation register. Subcontract flowdown matrix experience is a strong signal
Background in federal or defense contracting, agency-side, prime, or sub
Comfortable being the only compliance person on an engagement, with a vCISO firm for advice and an engineering team for implementation
US person, eligible for a Tier 3 background investigation
Have owned a FedRAMP authorization through to completion, on the provider or the assessor side. This is the single most valuable thing on this list and it moves our rate
Have written OSCAL by hand, or stood up a trust center against live control indicators
Bring a military background in security, intelligence, or information security
Hold a CMMC CCP or RP, or have worked in eMASS, Xacta, or Paramify
Know the GovRAMP reciprocity path into FedRAMP Class A
Have done exactly this as a contract engagement before and can describe what made it work or fail
You prepare the SPRS package and the FCL readiness materials; a company officer signs the submission and holds the FSO designation. Admin access to the federal enclave stays with employees.
Your compliance background is in financial services, insurance, or telecom. Large-team GRC with no federal exposure doesn't transfer here
You've assessed federal compliance programs but never owned one. Assessing a program and being accountable for it are different jobs
You want a retainer to advise. We have advisors. This engagement produces artifacts with dates on them
Accuracy under commercial pressure is negotiable for you. What we submit carries real legal exposure, and holding the truthful answer is the job
100% coverage across the board: medical through Oxford/United (Gold and Platinum PPO plans), dental through Guardian PPO, and vision through Beam — all fully covered for employees, with 100% coverage for dependents.
$100,000 in fully paid life insurance. FSA and Dependent Care FSA.
One Medical membership, on us — same-day primary care, 24/7 virtual visits, and offices all over the city.
Fertility and family-building support through Carrot.
401(k) through Guideline, with a 2% company match.
16 weeks of fully paid parental leave for birthing parents. 10 weeks fully paid for non-birthing parents.
Unlimited PTO, with a two-week minimum (we mean it when we say take time off!)
Closed for all federal holidays.
Company-wide winter break the week of Christmas.
Company offsites throughout the year.
Up to $750 one-time home office or desk setup stipend for NYC-based employees. $500 for remote employees.
$50/month commuter benefit (company contribution).
Expensed lunch while in the office.
Company-provided laptop of your choice.
Fully covered gym membership at Grindhouse — right across the street from our office at 47 W 17th St (and in Williamsburg). A $225/month value, on us. For remote employees, $100/month dedicated to gym or physical fitness reimbursement.